Luna Lovegood
Jan. 20th, 2006 01:02 pm< edit >
Yes, I completely misread the article. Was trying to get a .5 micron latex bead order out to Indiana to a guy who didn't speak English while reading/typing an entry. My absolute humblest apologies and many thanks to those who kindly pointed it out :)< / edit >
Header should be: here are 2 hopefuls mentioned in this article as possible Luna Lovegoods.
Jessica Hoggins:

or Laura Scaife:
Neither are quite the way I pictured Luna, myself. Just curious, which do you prefer?
[Poll #656675]
no subject
Date: 2006-01-20 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-20 11:56 pm (UTC)Meh.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-20 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-20 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:00 am (UTC)I see the Nicole Richie resemblence in the first one as well.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:17 am (UTC)I pictured Luna very thin and fey-like, with long, kinda tangley hair and a perpetual bemused expression. Neither girl has that.
...but between the lesser of two evils, I'll go with girl 2. And this is going to sound rude, but I hope she can lose some of that baby fat from her face. She just doesn't look right.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:23 am (UTC)Neither of them would be my first choice.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-22 06:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 01:20 am (UTC)They are NOT the two final candidates. They were simply two that focus was put on, to make things more interesting in the media scope of things.
...just thought I'd point that out before more people got confused. -_-
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 06:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 01:26 am (UTC)The first girl is very pretty and COMPLETELY wrong for Luna. Eyeliner? Done correctly? Not Luna.
The second girl is better, but not great. They are ruining my mental image of Luna.
Personally, I prefer the girl I sat next to on the plane from Dublin. She was much closer to how I thought Luna should look. Or my friend Sarah should do it. She'd be a perfect Luna. ^^
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 03:35 am (UTC)If this is the rate they're going then uhm, I'm not sure if I'll be happy to see the next movie.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 03:48 am (UTC)For the record, this is how I imagined Luna Lovegood...like the girl from Recess. =)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 04:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 06:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 05:11 am (UTC)http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c329/jellybeanbaby26/allofus002.jpg
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 05:18 am (UTC)Anna M
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 05:20 am (UTC)Where did you find this out at? I'm now mildly depressed, as Luna is my favorite character and neither of those girls, in my mind, are what Luna should look like.
Anna M
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 05:22 am (UTC)From www.veritaserum.com:
Two of the 400 hopefuls who are currently being considered for the role of Luna Lovegood in the Order of the Phoenix movie, 15 year-old Laura Scaife and 14 year-old Jessica Hoggins, were recently interviewed by their local newspapers.
Phew!
Anna M
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 06:09 am (UTC)i don't know...pretty?
though again, neither scream luna to me...
no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-21 06:48 am (UTC)Yes, CRAZY! ;)