no vote-issues
Feb. 4th, 2005 11:35 pmHi, I'm not a very active member in this community, neither am I in
platform_934. This is due to a whole bunch of work I have going on right now, sorry. Anyways, this morning, I took the time again to look at an application, which has apparently been edited because the answers had been too short before (here's the link).
I totally understand why people said "No Vote" as long as the answers were so short. I don't have a problem with that, really. But I just don't understand why it is necessary that 17 people say basically all the same, "No Vote until you elaborate more". Don't you think she might have gotten the hint after the first two or three already? It's just not necessary, that's all I'm saying.

I totally understand why people said "No Vote" as long as the answers were so short. I don't have a problem with that, really. But I just don't understand why it is necessary that 17 people say basically all the same, "No Vote until you elaborate more". Don't you think she might have gotten the hint after the first two or three already? It's just not necessary, that's all I'm saying.
